HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Keith Instone <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 30 Mar 1992 10:09:29 EST
Reply-To:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (96 lines)
Oh, if only I were a betting man.....
 
 
The College Hockey Computer Rating
compiled by Keith Instone
NOTE: TCHCR was *not* used in conjunction with the NCAA selection process.
 
Includes games on 3/29/92. Last week's ranking includes games on 3/22/92.
 
     Last                      Division I          Schedule Schedule
Rank Week Team                   Record    Rating  Strength   Rank
  1    2  Lake Superior         27  9  4    90.03    70.47      5
  2    1  Michigan              32  8  3    88.76    67.88      9
  3    5  Michigan State        24 10  8    82.83    69.05      7
  4    3  Minnesota             33 11  0    81.37    62.71     14
  5    6  Northern Michigan     25 14  3    76.15    63.74     12
  6    4  Maine                 29  4  2    75.16    47.30     26
  7    7  Wisconsin             26 13  2    72.11    60.71     18
  8    8  Western Michigan      16 14  6    70.86    69.02      8
  9   10  Miami                 17 17  6    68.28    69.70      6
 10   12  Ferris State          13 18  7    64.16    70.50      4
 11    9  Alaska-Anchorage      21  8  1    62.54    47.67     24
 12   20  Ohio State            12 21  5    60.39    70.67      3
 13   22  Illinois-Chicago      10 20  6    60.23    71.51      2
 14   15  Colorado College      18 18  5    59.77    60.75     17
 15   11  Boston University     21  9  4    59.42    47.58     25
 16   24  Bowling Green          8 21  5    58.66    72.63      1
 17   17  North Dakota          17 21  1    57.32    62.23     16
 18   18  Minnesota-Duluth      15 20  2    57.24    62.53     15
 19   16  Providence            21 13  2    57.01    47.95     22
 20   21  Michigan Tech         15 22  1    56.68    64.99     10
 21   13  New Hampshire         22 13  2    56.68    47.75     23
 22   14  St Lawrence           22  9  1    55.87    39.95     38
 23   23  St Cloud              13 21  1    55.30    64.07     11
 24   19  Clarkson              20 10  1    53.27    40.00     37
 25   25  Harvard               14  7  6    52.17    41.91     31
 26   27  Boston College        14 18  3    45.79    51.13     20
 27   26  Yale                  12  7  7    45.78    40.11     36
 28   29  Denver                 9 25  2    45.33    62.75     13
 29   28  Cornell               14 11  4    44.13    38.95     40
 30   30  Vermont               15 12  3    42.06    37.78     45
 31   32  Alaska-Fairbanks      14 17  0    40.64    43.57     30
 32   33  Kent                  10 14  2    40.61    45.84     27
 33   31  UMass-Lowell           9 19  4    40.00    52.77     19
 34   34  RPI                   13 15  4    38.25    41.13     34
 35   35  Northeastern          12 20  0    37.18    48.00     21
 36   36  Princeton             12 14  1    35.89    38.27     43
 37   37  Brown                 10 16  4    34.73    41.76     32
 38   38  Colgate               12 16  1    34.72    39.09     39
 39   39  Merrimack             12 21  0    33.45    44.19     29
 40   40  Alabama-Huntsville     8 11  0    32.32    38.46     42
 41   41  Notre Dame             8 19  0    27.39    45.17     28
 42   42  Dartmouth              3 21  2    13.94    41.72     33
 43   43  Air Force              4 22  0    12.71    38.05     44
 44   44  Union                  2 21  1     9.74    40.51     35
 45   45  Army                   2 16  0     8.06    38.87     41
 
The College Hockey Computer Rating uses a connected schedule graph and
a least squares optimization to rate the 45 Division I college hockey
teams. This method considers a team's opponents, and their opponents,
etc., until all 747 Division I games are included.
 
In addition to rating the teams, a strength of schedule is calculated
for each team. The schedule strength can be computed by averaging the
ratings of a team's opponents for each game.
 
For every game, the teams are evaluated based on: the outcome (win,
lose, tie); the margin of victory; percentage of goals allowed; the
site of the game (home, away, neutral ice); and overtime or regulation
time.
 
Only games against other Division I teams are considered.
 
Play-off games are weighted more than regular season games.
 
 
 
Notes for 3/29
 
If you would have used last week's TCHCR to pick the winners from the
NCAA regionals, you would have gone 7-1.  #7 Wisconsin beat #13 New
Hampshire and #14 St. Lawrence, #2 Lake Superior defeated #9
Alaska-Anchorage and #3 Minnesota, #5 Michigan State won over #11
Boston University, #6 Northern Michigan stopped #19 Clarkson and #1
Michigan edged #6 NMU. And even the lone "upset" of the weekend was not
too surprising, with Maine ranked #4, only 0.73 points ahead of #5
MSU.
 
Lake Superior moves into the top-ranked spot after its two impressive
wins over highly-rated opponents.
 
Wisconsin rose 2.31 points, but remained in seventh place for two
reasons. First, it had the "easiest" road, having to defeat two of the
three lowest ranked teams in the tournament. Also, three of its
opponents were eliminated: Minnesota, Northern Michigan and Maine.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2