HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Mar 1999 22:23:49 -0500
Reply-To:
Rich Shelley <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0 (WebTV)
Subject:
Re: Parker's comments
From:
Rich Shelley <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7Bit
In-Reply-To:
Duane Glass <[log in to unmask]>'s message of Mon, 29 Mar 1999 08:35:17 PST
Content-Type:
Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
Comments:
To: Duane Glass <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
Text/Plain (18 lines) 
<"And BTW, BC didn't deserve to be three by the criteria. Maine would
have stayed three and BC been four. BC would have faced UNH in the
second round.">
 
Depends on the choice of criteria. By the numbers, Maine deserved #2
(and a bye), BC #3, and Clarkson #4. Maybe, after the last two
tournament showings, there'll be an addendum to the 'Clarkson rule' --
spot them a couple goals going in.
 
Rich (obvious HE fan) Shelley
 
 
"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand."
                                                    --   Homer Simpson
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2