HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Lee P. Sveinson" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 17 Oct 1995 10:57:38 -0500
Comments:
cc: Jeff Walden <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
"Lee P. Sveinson" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
What is the general conscenses of the new WCHA fighting rules.  For those
who have not heard, the WCHA is piloting some new rules.  If a player
receives a fighting penalty he suspended for the rest of the game.  Then
next fighting penalty will, the player will get a three game suspension.
The third fighting penalty results in a season suspension.
 
I have a hard time with this logic.  I know that there is a lot of people
who say that there is too much violence in hockey.  But if you think
about it, these rules change the face of hockey.  By implementing these
rules, you tie the arms of teams that are big and physical.  UND is the
perfect example.  The last few years, UND basically recruited big
physical players.  With the crack down on physical play, UND seems to
have began recruiting smaller players.
 
I am not sure if I like the changes College hockey are implementing,
personally prefer physical hockey to finesse hockey.
 
What does everyone else thing, I am interested in other opinions.
 
Lee Sveinson
University Of North Dakota
Go SIOUX!
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2