Betcha can’t catch me (79).

> On Mar 26, 2017, at 7:31 PM, Tom <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks.  It looked to me as if the whole skate was in the area, and the stick on the ice, too, so I figured the rule was not what I remembered.  Getting old.
> 
> TR
> ------------------------------
> I hate it when people use big words just to make themselves sound perspicacious.
> ------------------------------
> On 3/26/2017 6:17 PM, Robert Woodbury wrote:
>> If it’s the goal I think you’re talking about, the officials ruled he didn’t interfere with the goalie. He was on the edge of the blue. I believe they changed the rule a couple of years ago where they used to call interference if the toe of a boot was in the blue and the man wearing the boot was in the men’s room.
>> 
>>> On Mar 26, 2017, at 4:17 PM, Tom <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Why wasn't the goal disallowed for a man in the crease?  I obviously don't understand the rule correctly.
>>> 
>>> Tom Rowe
>>> -- 
>>> ------------------------------
>>> I hate it when people use big words just to make themselves sound perspicacious.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> 
>