HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
The College Hockey Computer Rating <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Dec 90 01:29:18 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (77 lines)
The College Hockey Computer Rating
compiled by Keith Instone
 
Includes games on 12/9/90. Last week's ranking includes games on 12/2/90.
 
     Last                      Division I          Schedule Schedule
Rank Week Team                   Record    Rating  Strength   Rank
  1    1  Lake Superior         13  3  2   100.00    71.17      5
  2    3  Michigan              12  4  2    94.08    72.92      3
  3    2  Boston College         9  3  0    88.61    65.28     10
  4    7  Ferris State          10  3  5    86.15    67.68      9
  5    6  Bowling Green         11  5  2    85.87    71.14      6
  6    9  Boston University      9  3  1    83.96    59.26     13
  7    8  Minnesota             13  1  3    79.59    46.64     38
  8    4  Providence             8  3  1    78.28    58.37     14
  9   10  Northern Michigan     11  3  2    77.59    52.39     26
 10    5  Maine                 10  3  1    76.42    52.15     27
 11   12  Cornell                6  1  2    73.22    47.91     35
 12   20  New Hampshire         12  3  0    73.15    43.03     39
 13   11  Michigan State         6  8  4    72.47    75.58      1
 14   16  Clarkson               8  3  1    69.49    48.96     33
 15   14  Harvard                7  4  0    67.04    50.40     30
 16   15  Western Michigan       7  9  2    65.84    72.06      4
 17   18  St Lawrence            8  4  1    65.32    51.54     28
 18   13  Wisconsin             10  5  2    65.07    50.36     31
 19   21  RPI                    6  5  0    64.64    60.57     12
 20   22  Ohio State             5  8  3    63.21    75.11      2
 21   17  North Dakota          10  7  1    62.10    53.80     22
 22   19  Colgate                7  4  2    60.88    49.67     32
 23   24  Yale                   4  4  1    55.61    56.02     18
 24   23  Illinois-Chicago       6 12  0    54.38    70.35      8
 25   25  Merrimack              6  5  1    50.31    47.20     37
 26   26  Minnesota-Duluth       6  8  4    44.84    50.65     29
 27   27  Michigan Tech          6  9  1    44.37    53.00     24
 28   28  Vermont                4  6  1    42.75    52.93     25
 29   32  Miami                  3 13  2    42.08    70.71      7
 30   29  Alaska-Anchorage       3  7  3    40.26    53.19     23
 31   31  St Cloud               5  8  3    40.17    47.87     36
 32   34  Lowell                 4  8  1    39.05    54.85     21
 33   30  Princeton              3  7  0    37.43    54.98     19
 34   35  Notre Dame             3  5  1    31.23    41.60     41
 35   33  Alaska-Fairbanks       4  5  0    31.09    36.48     44
 36   36  Northeastern           2 12  1    28.11    61.96     11
 37   37  Brown                  1  7  2    24.82    56.19     17
 38   39  Colorado College       2 14  1    23.57    54.98     20
 39   40  Air Force              1  6  1    23.48    56.62     16
 40   38  Denver                 2 14  2    23.14    57.37     15
 41   41  Army                   1  7  3    22.52    47.98     34
 42   42  Alabama-Huntsville     2  7  1    15.76    38.91     42
 43   43  Kent State             2  7  1    14.41    36.81     43
 44   44  Dartmouth              0  5  1     0.00    41.70     40
 
The College Hockey Computer Rating uses a connected schedule graph and
a least squares optimization to rate the 44 Division I college hockey
teams. This method considers a team's opponents, and their opponents,
etc, until all 302 Division I games are included.
 
In addition to rating the teams, a strength of schedule is calculated
for each team. The schedule strength can be computed by averaging the
ratings of a team's opponents for each game.
 
The ratings are normalized so that the #1 team receives a 100.00 and
#44 gets a 0.00. Thus, the ratings are purely relative numbers, rating
a team based on the rest of college hockey and not on any absolute
basis.
 
For every game game, the teams are evaluated based on: the outcome
(win, lose, tie); the margin of victory; the site of the game (home,
away, neutral ice); and overtime or regulation time.
 
Only games against other Division I teams are considered.
 
Notes for 12/9: The WCHA teams are rated lower than most people would
expect. The WCHA as whole is rated low because it is 1-10 against teams
in the other 3 conferences.  The ECAC is 11-12, the CCHA is 6-4 and
Hockey East is 23-15 against teams in the opposing leagues.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2