HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dr. Bob Hamilton" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 18 Mar 2007 12:45:31 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Seems they are still missing something.  Let's take an extreme case where a
major player is injured and cannot play in the tournaments.  And to make it
even more interesting, what if the injury happens in the last game of the
season where the team loses the tournament championship and yet qualifies on
the current PWR.  Or what if they win and a post-game brouhaha leads to
significant DQ's, it seems they would still be in the regionals.  These are,
of course, extreme examples but it does get at the importance of looking at
recent performance.  Seems this is different from strength of schedule.
Thanks for your responses.  Bob Hamilton

-----Original Message-----
From: John T Whelan <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sunday, March 18, 2007 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: *AEI-SPAM-MARK* Re: Starting the Bitching Early


>On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Mark Lewin wrote:
>
>> I seem to remember that some time in the past, the selection process gave
>> more weight  to the last 20 games than to games earlier in the season but
>> that in recent times, that criteria was dropped
>
>Yes, and primarily because there was no strength-of-schedule
>adjustment.
> John Whelan
> Cornell '91

ATOM RSS1 RSS2