Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:15:44 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I do think 8-0 game is a bit tougher to call than say a one goal game.
Seney may have looked as if he won every face-off because the rest of
his team did not fare very well at all. Seney won 9 and lost 8. The
rest of his team was an abysmal 14-37.
Mike L. Larson
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe LaCour [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 8:59 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: FSN North Broadcast
Bad game. IMO, Union was not accustomed to the big ice nor the speed of
Minnesota and it showed. This was a game that 99.5% knew that
Minnesota was going to win before the puck dropped. The game got out of
hand early and Minnesota knew they could do whatever they wanted
whenever they wanted to do it. The announcers were filling whatever
they could to keep the audience there rather than flipping to FOXD for
the GLI.
Give some props to Scott Seney who seemed to win every draw he took.
Outside of that, not a good night for the Dutchmen.
Joe LaCour
CCT '77 & '78
Jim Teresco wrote:
> Maybe it's just because I'm frustrated watching my team get clobbered,
> but these FSN North announcers seem downright unprofessional the way
> they're calling this Union-Minnesota game. I have to ask those who
> hear them more often - are they always this bad, or is this just a bad
> game?
>
> --
> Jim Teresco - [log in to unmask]
> http://www.teresco.org
>
|
|
|