HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Lewin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sat, 4 Nov 2000 23:27:32 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
>The controversy was not over yet.  Union was again on a power play
>when the net was knocked off, but play was allowed to continue for
>several seconds before Jason Ralph scored into the dislodged net.  A
>very long argument followed, but the goal was allowed to stand.  I
>thought it should have been disallowed, but one of the people in my
>section says there is a new rule that if the defending team dislodges
>the net intentionally, play may be allowed to continue so long as it
>is unaffected by the fact that the net is loose.  This had to be the
>call here, as the net was clearly off, but moved no more than about 6
>inches.

This is a new rule this year. I was not at the game but the announcers on WRPI actually looked up the rule and read it over the air.  According to the new rules, if the defense intentionally dislodges the net during a scoring opportunity, play continues until the referee determines the scoring opportunity is over at which time the whistle is blown. During that time, if the offense scores, the goal counts.  From the
play by play on WRPI, that is exactly what happened for Union's 4th goal.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2