Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 4 Apr 1996 14:34:46 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thu, 4 Apr 1996, Mark J. Sonnier wrote:
> I think the only way ESPN could improve their coverage for the tourney would
> be for them to invite the color persons from the schools' regular radio/TV
> coverage crew. Then, we could listen to folks who followed CC and UM the
> whole year, rather than bringing in a regional personality who only follows
> the other schools at arm's length.
>
>
Zac Halter writes:
I concur with Mark's comment.
From what I have read in anyone's posts (mine included) regarding ESPN's
coverage, no one was saying that Mr. Norton doesn't know
his hockey. However, I felt he was a bit out of place for the championship
game. Specifically, I felt his comments during the game indicated
that he had a greater knowledge of UM than CC. In future games, perhaps
adding a rink-side commentator from a network that regularly covers the
leagues involved would have created a more insightful dialogue.
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|