Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 23 Feb 1998 11:58:17 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Estimated NCAA Division 1 Ice Hockey ratings percentage index
based on 619 games played through 02/22/98
Game scores for this calculation provided by www.uscollegehockey.com
Weight 35% 50% 15%
G W L T win% rank opp% rank opp-opp Total
1 North Dakota 30 25- 4- 1 85.00 ( 1) 50.55 (22) 51.39 ( 4) 62.73
2 Boston University 29 22- 5- 2 79.31 ( 4) 53.64 ( 6) 50.50 (19) 62.15
3 Michigan State 32 24- 4- 4 81.25 ( 2) 51.16 (17) 50.91 (12) 61.65
4 New Hampshire 28 21- 6- 1 76.79 ( 5) 50.39 (25) 50.40 (22) 59.63
5 Michigan 32 23- 8- 1 73.44 ( 6) 52.30 ( 9) 51.26 ( 5) 59.54
6 Yale 25 20- 5- 0 80.00 ( 3) 44.35 (38) 49.14 (29) 57.55
7 Boston College 30 18- 8- 4 66.67 ( 7) 50.85 (19) 51.19 ( 6) 56.43
8 St Cloud 28 16-10- 2 60.71 (11) 52.56 ( 8) 50.85 (13) 55.16
9 Clarkson 25 15- 7- 3 66.00 ( 8) 49.02 (31) 48.37 (40) 54.86
10 Miami 31 17-10- 4 61.29 (10) 51.21 (16) 51.52 ( 3) 54.79
11 Ohio State 30 17-11- 2 60.00 (12) 51.27 (15) 51.17 ( 7) 54.31
12 Wisconsin 30 18-11- 1 61.67 ( 9) 48.35 (33) 51.96 ( 1) 53.55
13 Colorado College 31 17-11- 3 59.68 (13) 49.57 (28) 51.02 ( 8) 53.33
14 Northern Michigan 31 15-12- 4 54.84 (17) 50.91 (18) 50.98 ( 9) 52.30
15 Colgate 27 14-10- 3 57.41 (14) 49.56 (29) 48.96 (34) 52.22
16 Maine 28 12-13- 3 48.21 (26) 54.35 ( 5) 50.39 (23) 51.61
17 Cornell 24 12-10- 2 54.17 (20) 50.41 (24) 48.83 (37) 51.49
18 Northeastern 30 16-12- 2 56.67 (16) 47.80 (35) 50.96 (10) 51.38
19 Lake Superior 31 15-12- 4 54.84 (17) 48.28 (34) 50.78 (14) 50.95
20 Minnesota-Duluth 30 14-14- 2 50.00 (22) 51.41 (14) 50.33 (24) 50.76
21 Minnesota 32 14-18- 0 43.75 (29) 54.71 ( 4) 50.42 (20) 50.23
22 Mass Lowell 29 13-13- 3 50.00 (22) 50.48 (23) 49.24 (28) 50.13
23 Notre Dame 34 14-16- 4 47.06 (27) 51.88 (11) 50.94 (11) 50.05
24 Princeton 23 10- 8- 5 54.35 (19) 46.89 (37) 49.26 (27) 49.86
25 Rensselaer 27 14-10- 3 57.41 (14) 44.20 (39) 49.04 (32) 49.55
26 Providence 31 13-15- 3 46.77 (28) 51.46 (13) 49.43 (26) 49.51
27 Ferris State 32 14-15- 3 48.44 (25) 49.38 (30) 50.64 (18) 49.24
28 Harvard 25 9-14- 2 40.00 (32) 55.20 ( 1) 48.37 (39) 48.85
29 Brown 24 10-13- 1 43.75 (29) 51.62 (12) 48.78 (38) 48.44
30 Michigan Tech 30 12-16- 2 43.33 (31) 49.62 (27) 51.59 ( 2) 47.71
31 Denver 30 10-19- 1 35.00 (34) 54.95 ( 2) 49.62 (25) 47.17
32 Dartmouth 25 11-10- 4 52.00 (21) 42.07 (43) 48.95 (35) 46.58
33 Mankato State 26 12-12- 2 50.00 (22) 42.42 (42) 49.12 (31) 46.08
34 Western Michigan 34 9-24- 1 27.94 (37) 54.92 ( 3) 50.41 (21) 44.80
35 Alaska-Fairbanks 29 7-19- 3 29.31 (35) 52.06 (10) 50.69 (16) 43.89
36 Vermont 28 9-17- 2 35.71 (33) 47.67 (36) 48.87 (36) 43.66
37 Merrimack 30 8-21- 1 28.33 (36) 50.56 (21) 49.04 (33) 42.55
38 St Lawrence 25 5-18- 2 24.00 (39) 53.41 ( 7) 48.03 (42) 42.31
39 Alaska-Anchorage 32 6-22- 4 25.00 (38) 50.62 (20) 50.64 (17) 41.66
40 Bowling Green 33 6-24- 3 22.73 (40) 49.85 (26) 50.77 (15) 40.50
41 Mass Amherst 27 5-20- 2 22.22 (41) 44.16 (40) 49.13 (30) 37.23
42 Army 15 2-13- 0 13.33 (43) 48.60 (32) 45.90 (43) 35.85
43 Union 26 3-20- 3 17.31 (42) 43.52 (41) 48.15 (41) 35.04
44 Air Force 9 1- 8- 0 11.11 (44) 40.78 (44) 44.72 (44) 30.99
Average 49.02 49.75 49.83 49.51
Standard Deviation 18.67 3.53 1.45 7.11
range 11.11 40.78 44.72
to 85.00 55.20 51.96
This information is freely available for personal use.
Copyright 1998 Charlie Shub.
Republication without permission is prohibited.
This calculation includes only teams eligible for the NCAA tournament.
Since Nebraska-Omaha and Niagara both fit the definition of
an Emerging Program, and the NCAA does not include emerging programs
in their calculations, their games are not included.
The total is calculated by the Rating Percentage Index method,
used as a tool by the NCAA in selecting teams for national
collegiate tournaments in several sports. Ratings are derived
by summing each team's winning percentage, the average winning
percentage of its opponents, and the average winning percentage
of its opponents' opponents, multiplied by the given weights.
Factors such as importance of game, margin of victory, or home
ice are not included in the calculations.
charlie shub University of Colorado at Colorado Springs
[log in to unmask] -or- [log in to unmask] -or- [log in to unmask]
(719) 262-3492 (fax) 262-3369 http://www.cs.uccs.edu/~cdash
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|