HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Erik Biever <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Jan 1992 13:36:00 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
david writes:
 
> This weekend, I was listening to the Wisconsin-Denver games on the
> radio (why didn't *we* get it on TV?) and the conclusion of the
> announcers was that all the talk about the "new emphasis" penalties was
> just that talk -- as last year, by the Christmas break, everything was
> back to normal" in the WCHA -- games being called a lot looser, lots
> of hooking/holding/interference being ignored, etc.
 
> As one of them put it, "The coaches run the league, and the coaches won
> the war."
 
> So, WCHA watchers -- is this what you have seen? I haven't seen enough
> games recently to make a judgement, plus of course, each game and each
> ref is different....
 
That is consistent with what I have seen so far this season.  The "new
emphasis" seemed to fade away after the first few weeks of the season,
to be replaced with business as usual. I'm not sure whether it is fair
to attribute the blame or credit to the coaches.
 
-- Erik

ATOM RSS1 RSS2