HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 31 Oct 1991 11:02:33 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
I'd like to think that the new HE alignment (BC,PC,UNH,UMLowell -
BU,Maine,Merrimack,NU) was designed more for balance of strength
rather than to give easier rides to the perennial strong teams.
For instance, roughly approximating last years performances, the
conference appeared 3 tiered:
 
                (BC, Maine, BU)
                (PC, UNH)
                (UMLowell, Merrimack, NU)
 
If you accept this as a representation of recent strength, then the
new alignment seems logically balanced. I at least hope that it was
balance rather than jockeying for better NCAA position that led to
these divisions. Whatever the case, I agree with Mike that the
divisions definitely ought to be changed each year, perhaps based on the
previous year's finish, but changed nonetheless.
 
				Mark Daly
				[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2