Jim makes a good point about Harrick in relation to Woog/Walsh, but I'll say
this. ...
 
There are many around UCLA who will not consider this a big loss, despite the
'95 title.
 
I'm not saying that UCLA thought about it this way, or am I making a judgment
on Walsh/Woog, etc... only throwing that out there as a POSSIBILITY for the
difference in the cases.
 
Had it been a coach that everyone like and thought was real good ... would UCLA
have done the same thing?  Just something to consider before putting the UCLA
president above those at Minnesota and Maine.
 
AW
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.