HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Arthur Berman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 5 Mar 1995 15:37:12 -0700
In-Reply-To:
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
On Sun, 5 Mar 1995, Glen Keeney wrote:
 
> I agree about eliminating teams from the playoffs and letting theregular
> season have at least a little bit of meaning.
>
> As to the revenue; that must not have been the reasoning behind allowing
> the 8/9 game in HE since HE dropped the other playoffs to single games
> rather than 2 of 3 - or perhaps the TV revenue more than made up for
> the loss of the extra 1 or 2 (per series) playoff game.  The $ must be
> there someplace - not just for NCAA but also all the conferences - and
> I guess all the schools for that matter.  $$ rule - long live the $ (or
> however that saying goes).
>
A couple of weeks ago between periods of a BU radio broadcast the comment
was made (and perhaps echoed on this list, I can't recall) that the
reason for only one game quarterfinals in HE this year was the feeling
that the market was saturated with NC$$ games in both Worcester and
Providence.
 
Arthur Berman  [log in to unmask]
GO BU!!!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2