HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Erik Biever <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 22 Jan 1995 22:59:31 -0600
Reply-To:
Erik Biever <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Tony Buffa writes:
 
>Second, I second the motion to somehow change the RPI thing to RI (ratings
>index?) or somesuch.  It can be a bit confusing esp if you are mentioning
>RPI's RPI!  And no self respecting alum will condescend to use
>"Rensselaer" I think :-)
 
As long as the NC$$ applies the name "Rating Percentage Index" to their
ranking, I think we're stuck with calling it RPI.  RPICH, on the other hand,
is a sufficiently distinct name that I don't plan to change it.
 
-- Erik
 
GO GOPHERS!
SKI-U-MAH!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2