Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 24 Mar 2003 08:36:25 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Estimated NCAA Division 1 Ice Hockey PAIRWISE COMPARISONS
based on 94 games played through 03/23/03
Game scores for this calculation provided by www.uscho.com
Software to perform the calculation developed by Charlie Shub
index team games win % rank being considered rpi rank won
----- ---- ----- ----- ---- ---------------- --- ---- ---
1 Colorado College 17 61.76 ( 3 ) ( 9- 5- 3) 61.76 53.61 ( 2 ) 15
2 New Hampshire 12 58.33 ( 4 ) ( 6- 4- 2) 58.33 53.89 ( 1 ) 13
3 Minnesota 21 52.38 ( 7 ) ( 8- 7- 6) 52.38 52.22 ( 3 ) 12
4 Maine 14 67.86 ( 2 ) ( 9- 4- 1) 67.86 52.06 ( 4 ) 12
5 North Dakota 15 50.00 ( 8t) ( 6- 6- 3) 50.00 51.41 ( 5 ) 11
6 MSU-Mankato 17 47.06 (10t) ( 6- 7- 4) 47.06 51.01 ( 6 ) 9
7 St. Cloud State 16 46.88 (12 ) ( 6- 7- 3) 46.88 49.71 ( 7 ) 8
8 Cornell 8 75.00 ( 1 ) ( 6- 2- 0) 75.00 46.81 (12 ) 8
9 Michigan 9 55.56 ( 5t) ( 4- 3- 2) 55.56 48.24 (10 ) 7
10 Wayne State 2 50.00 ( 8t) ( 1- 1- 0) 50.00 49.67 ( 8 ) 7
11 Boston College 13 42.31 (13 ) ( 4- 6- 3) 42.31 48.66 ( 9 ) 6
12 Ferris State 9 55.56 ( 5t) ( 5- 4- 0) 55.56 43.99 (14 ) 5
13 Boston University 17 47.06 (10t) ( 8- 9- 0) 47.06 48.10 (11 ) 4
14 Ohio State 8 25.00 (14 ) ( 1- 5- 2) 25.00 44.43 (13 ) 2
15 Mercyhurst 3 0.00 (16 ) ( 0- 3- 0) 0.00 42.33 (15 ) 1
16 Harvard 7 7.14 (15 ) ( 0- 6- 1) 7.14 38.16 (16 ) 0
Teams can earn points for each of the following criteria:
1. Head to head Competition (one point per game)
2. Record against common opponents
3. Record against teams under consideration
4. Ratings percentage index
The record against teams
under consideration, the ratings percentage index, and
the number of pairwise comparisons won are listed above.
The Ratings percentage index is used as a tiebreaker.
Estimated NCAA Division 1 Ice Hockey ratings percentage index
based on 94 games played through 03/23/03
Game scores for this calculation provided by www.uscho.com
Software to perform the calculation developed by Charlie Shub
Weight 25% 50% 25%
G W L T win% rank opp% rank opp-opp Total
1 New Hampshire 12 6- 4- 2 58.33 ( 4 ) 54.14 ( 4 ) 48.93 (10 ) 53.89
2 Colorado College 17 9- 5- 3 61.76 ( 3 ) 50.15 (11 ) 52.37 ( 1 ) 53.61
3 Minnesota 21 8- 7- 6 52.38 ( 7 ) 52.43 ( 7 ) 51.63 ( 2 ) 52.22
4 Maine 14 9- 4- 1 67.86 ( 2 ) 44.53 (14 ) 51.31 ( 6 ) 52.06
5 North Dakota 15 6- 6- 3 50.00 ( 8t) 52.30 ( 8 ) 51.03 ( 7 ) 51.41
6 MSU-Mankato 17 6- 7- 4 47.06 (10t) 52.73 ( 5 ) 51.53 ( 4 ) 51.01
7 St. Cloud State 16 6- 7- 3 46.88 (12 ) 51.02 (10 ) 49.93 ( 8 ) 49.71
8 Wayne State 2 1- 1- 0 50.00 ( 8t) 57.14 ( 2 ) 34.39 (16 ) 49.67
9 Boston College 13 4- 6- 3 42.31 (13 ) 51.40 ( 9 ) 49.54 ( 9 ) 48.66
10 Michigan 9 4- 3- 2 55.56 ( 5t) 45.02 (13 ) 47.35 (12 ) 48.24
11 Boston Universit 17 8- 9- 0 47.06 (10t) 48.63 (12 ) 48.10 (11 ) 48.10
12 Cornell 8 6- 2- 0 75.00 ( 1 ) 30.36 (16 ) 51.52 ( 5 ) 46.81
13 Ohio State 8 1- 5- 2 25.00 (14 ) 56.55 ( 3 ) 39.62 (15 ) 44.43
14 Ferris State 9 5- 4- 0 55.56 ( 5t) 34.39 (15 ) 51.61 ( 3 ) 43.99
15 Mercyhurst 3 0- 3- 0 0.00 (16 ) 61.46 ( 1 ) 46.40 (13 ) 42.33
16 Harvard 7 0- 6- 1 7.14 (15 ) 52.44 ( 6 ) 40.61 (14 ) 38.16
Average 46.37 49.67 47.87 48.39
Standard Deviation 19.46 7.72 5.06 4.21
range 0.00 30.36 34.39
to 75.00 61.46 52.37
This information is freely available for personal use.
The total is calculated by the Rating Percentage Index method,
used as a tool by the NCAA in selecting teams for national
collegiate tournaments in several sports. Ratings are derived
by summing each team's winning percentage, the average winning
percentage of its opponents, and the average winning percentage
of its opponents' opponents, multiplied by the given weights.
Factors such as importance of game, margin of victory, or home
ice are not included in the calculations.
charlie shub University of Colorado at Colorado Springs
[log in to unmask] http://cs.uccs.edu/~cdash
(719) 262-3492 (fax) 262-3369
|
|
|