> 2. 2 violations were related to the 1993 Championship. The NCAA
> Executive Committee declared that they were of a nature such that
> the 1993 Championship should not be vacated.
>
> I've left off lots of detail, but I think it addresses the question.
Were the two violations for use of ineligible players? I recall one for
improper compensation of a player by USA Hockey (How the player didn't know
where that extra money in his bank account came from I still don't get, but
we've covered that...) but I can't remember what the other violation was.
This isn't intended to start a bunch of Maine bashing. Now that everything
has been resolved, I'm just looking for a re-cap of why the Championship was
in question and what the NCAA reasoning was for not taking it away.
H
\_ \_ \_ Howard M. Quimby [log in to unmask]
\_\_\_ \_ Natural Intelligence, Inc. Tel (617) 876-7680 x1208
\_ \__ \_ Cambridge, MA Fax (617) 492-7425
\_ \_ \_
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.