You get the main point buddy.  UVM will win...
 
On Sun, 27 Feb 1994, Glenn W. Gale wrote:
 
> "C. Sammy Hager" <[log in to unmask]> wrote...
>
> >1) Clarkson             13-6-3  29
> >2) Brown                13-7-2  28
> >3) Harvard              13-8-1  27
> >4) Vermont              11-9-2  24
> >5) Colgate              11-9-2  24
> >6) RPI                  10-9-3  23
> >7) Princeton            10-9-3  23
> >8) Cornell              9-10-3  21
> >9) St. Lawrence         10-12-0 20
> >10)Dartmouth            7-13-2  16
> >11)Union                6-12-4  16
> >12)Yale                 6-13-3  15
>
> >1st round playoffs
> >Princeton 5-Dartmouth 1
> >Cornell 2-SLU 1
>
> >2nd round
> >UVM 8-Colgate 6 (2-1)
> >Harvard 5-RPI 3 (2-1)
> >Brown 3-Princeton 1 (2-1)
> >Clarkson 4- Cornell 0 (2-0)
>
> >ECAC final UVM 3-Clarkson 2 OT (2-1)
> >Go Cats Go!!!
> >See ya at Lake Placid!
>
>      In addition to the discrepancies in the above final standings
> pointed out by Bill Fenwick, the predicted playoff results would
> necessitate UVM playing Clarkson in the semifinals (#1 vs. #4 seed,
> and #2 vs. #3), not the final.
>
>
> -Glenn
>