 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed |
| Date: |
Mon, 7 Mar 2011 11:38:51 -0500 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
<3C296B26D3AE44CB867AEA2D66EADB75@EricPC> |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Except Michigan Tech. And maybe Bemidji and Mankato. And perhaps St.
Cloud and Anchorage. Other than that...
On Mar 7, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Eric J. Burton wrote:
>> Say what you may about the ECAC, one thing that is always true,
>> year after,
>> is that the ECAC is the most competitive (intra-league) from top
>> to bottom.
> As a WCHA fan, that statement is false... No league is as
> competative top to bottom as the WCHA, where any team can win on
> any night, most of the top ten Stenght of Schedule is made up of
> WCHA teams...
|
|
|
