Interesting argument. To summarize:
Two UVM players broke a written rule ( as a member of the rules committee, their
coach presumably is familiar with the rules) and when Cornell calls them on it
(in a manner prescribed within the rules), UVM complains.
 
This elevates to new heights the practice of blaming the victim for the crime.
If you truly believe that Cornell is guilty and UVM is innocent, allow me to
sell you
this theory: did you know that OJ was framed by the entire LAPD and DA's
office ?????
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.