HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:55:19 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Hampton, Nathan E.
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Isn't it the case for checking from behind, that it is a 5-minute major and Game DQ automatically? If the call was checking from
> behind, than there is no choice or option for the referee. Normally referees try to wiggle out of the automatic DQ by calling boarding
> instead of checking from behind. That is where the real judgment comes in. But if the call was boarding, and then the Game DQ was
> done separately, then it must have been for a different reason.

Checking from behind into the boards or the net is a 5-minute major
and either a Game Misconduct or a Game Disqualification.

You're right, though, that Boarding is the call used to keep a player
in the game, if the referee doesn't feel that it warrants ejection.

John

-- 
John Edwards
I used to put quotes here.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2