>
> Now, my question: Michigan's second goal. The Michigan player broke
> into the zone and got off a shot. Callinan caught the puck and then was
> knocked into the net by a fallen defensman. I was under the impression
> that if the goalie had control of the puck and was then knocked into the
> net that there would be no goal, and yet there was a goal awarded on
> this play. Does anyone have an explainiation of this ruling? Or was it
> ruled that the goalie did not have control of the puck?
>
I had the exact same impression! But my bro-in-law said he saw the puck
come out of Callinan's glove. We'll have to watch for this on the
replays, but I didn't see the puck on the ice.
How about the go-ahead goal? Did I hear correctly that an assist was
given to Callinan?
Reed