Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:41:45 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
UND is using a Arena that is owned by a private corporation.
The arena is sitting on university propterty.
Eric J. Burton
(701)-610-9466
http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: - Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Erik Biever
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 4:08 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Sioux Dispute
Not an issue, UND doesn't own the arena.
- Erik
Bill Corrigan wrote:
> Cynical me, but I have to wonder whether, to some degree, UND's
> stance on this matter has anything to do with stipulations Ralph
> Englestad may have imposed when he donated the construction costs of
> the new Englestad Arena in 1999. I seem to remember that he threatened
> to have his company withdraw from the project if the University voted
> to change either the school's athletic logo (Indian head) or nickname
> (Fighting Sioux).
>
> Could it be that there was a binding provision in the gift
> arrangement that (still) prevents the University from altering
> characteristics of this sort that are displayed in the arena?
>
> I know that the NCAA edict applies to all athletic teams/sites at
> UND, but is it possible that the University is making this stand (at
> least in part) because it is seeking to avoid a legal challenge in
> connection with any remodeling of their most expensive structure if the
> NCAA prevails in this matter?
>
> I'm sure there are far more weighty issues involved than those
> pertaining to the University's marquee sport and facility but,
> nevertheless, it's interesting to speculate.
|
|
|