I never understand what "PC" means.  What in the accepted principles of
competent leadership would make it necessary to strike a player and
refuse to cooperate in an investigation of the incident by the proper
oversight authority?  Or is physical assault not something which
warrants review?  What makes it unreasonable for an administration to
look into it and take action when a coach refuses to cooperate?   Should
it be purely left to the coach to strike players whenever it suits him?
What makes it "PC"?

Bob Griebel



[log in to unmask] wrote:

> In a message dated 11/15/2002 11:10:31 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> > http://clarkson.dailyjolt.com/morris_announcement.html
>
> Another victory for the PC police.