HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 26 Mar 2017 18:31:15 -0500
Reply-To:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
From:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Thanks.  It looked to me as if the whole skate was in the area, and the 
stick on the ice, too, so I figured the rule was not what I remembered.  
Getting old.

TR
------------------------------
I hate it when people use big words just to make themselves sound 
perspicacious.
------------------------------
On 3/26/2017 6:17 PM, Robert Woodbury wrote:
> If it’s the goal I think you’re talking about, the officials ruled he didn’t interfere with the goalie. He was on the edge of the blue. I believe they changed the rule a couple of years ago where they used to call interference if the toe of a boot was in the blue and the man wearing the boot was in the men’s room.
>
>> On Mar 26, 2017, at 4:17 PM, Tom <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Why wasn't the goal disallowed for a man in the crease?  I obviously don't understand the rule correctly.
>>
>> Tom Rowe
>> -- 
>> ------------------------------
>> I hate it when people use big words just to make themselves sound perspicacious.
>> ------------------------------
>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2