HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Apr 2004 22:09:13 -0400
Reply-To:
Scott Kaplan <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<016c01c41c2e$4a7d1040$2bdf1941@yourivc7xrn4yf>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From:
Scott Kaplan <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
Based on the what happened during the last lockout, and recent articles I've
found online, it appears as though the lockout will not affect the AHL.

Sources:

http://sports.mainetoday.com/pirates/stories/040211lockout.shtml

http://www.freep.com/sports/hockey/pahl31_20040331.htm

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/hockey/minors/2004-03-26-ahl-president-q-and-
a_x.htm

http://www.boston.com/sports/nesn/caron/03_24_04/

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04067/282393.stm

Here's a good quote from the last article:

"During the 1994 lockout, players on their initial NHL contracts and those
who never played in the league were permitted to play in the AHL by an
agreement between the owners and union. But the relationship between those
sides appears to be markedly more acrimonious now, and the union might well
use the minor leagues as leverage."

So, if they do things the same way as last time, you'll see guys like
Parise, Pock, etc in the AHL next fall.

-----Original Message-----
From: - Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of J. Michael Neal
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 7:24 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Zach Parise Inks a Deal with the Devil(s)


----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Kaplan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: Zach Parise Inks a Deal with the Devil(s)


> The problem is, the players won't be on strike. The owners will lock out
the players without a CBA in place. That is a major difference. Management
can send a young player down to the minors, so that he will get some playing
time and experience, even while the big club is shut down. None of the
players would be referred to as "scabs" in that situation, since there'd be
no picket line to cross.


Based upon the research I did in regard to baseball's labor problems, there
is no distinction between a strike and a lockout in this regard.  When
management institutes a lockout, they do so against the bargaining unit, not
against a particular subset thereof.

J. Michael Neal
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.648 / Virus Database: 415 - Release Date: 3/31/2004

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.648 / Virus Database: 415 - Release Date: 3/31/2004

ATOM RSS1 RSS2