Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 22:08:19 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 01:19 PM 1/31/2002 -0700, Charlie Shub wrote:
>just picking nits here, but the plan is, as i understood it, to have
>the top 4 teams host the regionals, not to require the top 4 teams to
>stage the regionals on their campus venues.
I think this is what MacDonald might have been saying. I (along with
Joe L.) have a hard time believing that *either* Clarkson or St. Lawrence
would have an easy time of hosting regionals in Potsdam/Canton.
>a couple of years ago, UAA (anchorage) hosted the NCAA championships
>in Los Angeles. It would seem to me that it might be a winner for a
>school to host a regional off campus (or even at a town othere that
>where the campus is)
That said, how does hosting the regionals benefit you if it's off campus?
Is there $$ involved? I know BU has hosted regionals at Worcester and
RPI in Albany, but what do they get out of it?
-Andy
|
|
|