HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
College Hockey discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Sean Pickett <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Mar 1995 14:56:26 -0500
Reply-To:
Sean Pickett <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
>Can somebody tell me why the ECAC uses a "3-point series" format (first
>team to earn three points, advances) for their quarterfinal round instead
>of a "best of three" with overtimes each night?  The current format appears
>to place excessive importance on winning Game #1 of the series and also
>seems calculated to diminish the need for a third and deciding game.....
>because any lead generated in Game #2 by a first night winner automatically
>becomes one goal more than the scoreboard shows from the standpoint of
>their opposition and a first night tie produces a winner-take-all second
>game.  Let's Go Bruno!
 
You answered your own question.  :-)  It would appear that the ECAC wants to
minimize the the chance of having the two teams play three games in a row.
Remember, the ECAC is the 'academic' league (at least in their own eyes).   ;-)
 
Sean Pickett
Go BU Terriers, 1994 Hockey East Champions!
BU Hockey:  http://www.tiac.net/users/spickett/hockey.html
E-mail: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2