HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John T Whelan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
John T Whelan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 07:49:46 -0600
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (28 lines)
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Rick Sayles wrote:

> 2002-2003 NCAA Division I RPI Ratings

Hi Rick,

It looks like you're using the "old" formula for the hockey RPI, 35%
of winning percentage, 50% of opponents' winning percentage and 15% of
opponents' opponents' winning percentage.  According to

http://www.uscho.com/news/2002/06/27_004475.php

the committee decided to go back to the 25/50/25 formula used by the
rest of the NCAA.  (This was done to keep teams with good records
against weak schedules from getting the higher RPIs we've seen in the
past; of course hockey originally switched to 35/50/15 in the first
place because the 25/50/25 formula makes it easier to beat a bad team
and see your RPI go down.)

Anyway, I've got an RPI page linked off of http://slack.net/hockey/
which contains the current RPI, updated daily, and I'd be happy to
check our results against each other.
                                          John Whelan, Cornell '91
                                                 [log in to unmask]
                                     http://www.amurgsval.org/joe/

Enjoy the latest Hockey Geek tools at slack.net/hockey

ATOM RSS1 RSS2