LISTSERV - HOCKEY-L Archives

HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	HOCKEY-L Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: I guess I answered my question
From:	GARDNER GEOFFREY C <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	GARDNER GEOFFREY C <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Mon, 18 Mar 2002 13:38:22 -0500
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (15 lines)

Could it also be a policy to increase attendence?  This year in the
Sqeakball Tournament, the NCAA placed teams close to home.  Their seeding
also resulted in a West bracket that is considerably harder than the other
regions (4 of the top 8 teams, 10 confrence winners etc.).  One of the
driving forces for this was to increase attendence at the opening round
sites.  Could this be the goal for the hockey tourny as well?


-geoff

> I agree wholeheartedly.  As someother people have mentioned, it's
> probably more of an excuse to save money.  Hopefully this is the last
> of it
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.MAINE.EDU