>
> Now, my question:  Michigan's second goal.  The Michigan player broke
> into the zone and got off a shot.  Callinan caught the puck and then was
> knocked into the net by a fallen defensman.  I was under the impression
> that if the goalie had control of the puck and was then knocked into the
> net that there would be no goal, and yet there was a goal awarded on
> this play.  Does anyone have an explainiation of this ruling?  Or was it
> ruled that the goalie did not have control of the puck?
>
 
I had the exact same impression! But my bro-in-law said he saw the puck
come out of Callinan's glove. We'll have to watch for this on the
replays, but I didn't see the puck on the ice.
 
How about the go-ahead goal? Did I hear correctly that an assist was
given to Callinan?
 
Reed