Hi All:
 
I know it is too late to affect anything, but arent these games
videotaped?  Someone could certainly take a slomo look, esp if the camera
does a narrow angle focus to follow the action. Just a thought. Maybe not?
 
Tony Buffa
RPI '64
 
==========
On Sat, 14 Mar 1998, Justin Huyck wrote:
 
> First of all, the second disputed goal was clearly not a goal...it hit
> the post and bounced to the boards.  The light did go on, but that was
> probably because of the goal-judges ansiness after the first disputed
> goal....
>
> Which brings me to the FIRST disputed goal!  I was sitting right behind
> the net, and I have to agree with Mr. Lewin that it was clearly a goal.
> It seemed to reach the back of the net, even toucing the net, and bounce
> out.  If it had not been a goal, and had instead hit the post, the
> bounce it would have taken would have been different.
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.