Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 May 1993 01:00:59 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
From Mr. Mike Machnik's notes:
>>* Defined coincidental penalties for Rule 4-2-e and Rule 4-3-b to include
>>penalties assessed at the same stoppage of play.
>
>I'm not sure where this adds anything new...I am guessing it comes into
>play in situations where a delayed penalty or penalties are being called
>and after the whistle, other penalties are called.
I'm taking a stab in the dark with this, but I think this has to do with the
new rule made last year dealing with coincidental minors. Before last year,
when coincidental minors were called, it was a four-on-four situation. This
was also the case when two separate minors were called. Last year, they
changed the rule so that when coincidental minors were called, it was still a
five-on-five situation. The problem: when two separate minors are called and
assessed at the same stoppage of play, is it to be four-on-four or
five-on-five? The new rule cleared this up calling anything assessed at the
same time, whether they were simultaneous or not, coincidental.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
** ** Chris Boston
** **
* * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * ** ** * [log in to unmask]
* * * ***** * * * *
* * * * * * * *
** ** University "Home is where your hockey team is!"
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
|
|
|