>Clay wrote:
> I think itís to
>the NCAAís credit (I donít compliment them very often) that they
>think that seeding teams fairly
>is more important than futzing with the seedings to improve attendance.
If the committee wanted to be concerned with attendance and $$$ as
opposed to fair seating, they could have chosen Colorado College to
be in. That would have increased the attendance in the western
region a lot I do believe. But, they used the bonus enough to bump
CC out. giving credit for those quality wins away and on neutral ice
instead.
--