HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" ; format="flowed"
Date:
Sat, 27 Mar 2004 14:52:46 -0600
Reply-To:
Brett Harvey <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Brett Harvey <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
>Clay wrote:
>  I think itís to
>the NCAAís credit (I donít compliment them very often) that they
>think that seeding teams fairly
>is more important than futzing with the seedings to improve attendance.

If the committee wanted to be concerned with attendance and $$$ as
opposed to fair seating, they could have chosen Colorado College to
be in.  That would have increased the attendance in the western
region a lot I do believe.  But, they used the bonus enough to bump
CC out.  giving credit for those quality wins away and on neutral ice
instead.



--

ATOM RSS1 RSS2