(rankings based on when they played)
The have played h-St Lawrence, h-Ohio State (4th), a/h-St Cloud (11th), a-Wisconsin
(8th), h-Colorado College (3rd), h-North Dakota (1st), a-Alaska/Anchorage, h-
Michagan(ranked?), h-Michigan State (3rd?), h-Princeton(top ten?), h-Ohio State,
a-Boston College.
I'd to see any one else match that schedule for difficulty.
Tony Buffa wrote:
> HI Kevin:
>
> Admittedly I am an eastern hockey follower living in CA, but do they rate
> difficulty of schedule? some WCHA fan recently described it this year as
> two very good teams and a bunch of mediocre one. Given that 28 of the 34
> games are in conference, how can it be a difficult schedule? Or at least
> more difficult than other teams in the middle of other conferences?
>
> I enjoy your comments, just a thought. Take care.
>
> Tony Buffa
> RPI '64
>
> ===================
> On Tue, 5 Jan 1999, Kevin Ames wrote:
>
> > I am actually suprised that with the gophers poor showing last year and their
> > mediocore at best showing this year, that this thread took so long to finally
> > come out. With the gophers poor showings in their own tournaments this year,
> > one of the most difficult schedules in the country, the signings, the
> > injuries, and a freshman goalie I think they are doing well... not great mind
> > you... but well.
--
<------------------------->
|Kevin L Ames |
|Ames Agency - Insurance |
|1996 Agent of the Year |
|email:[log in to unmask]
|ICQ:4568239 |
<------------------------->
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|