HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Art Benton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Art Benton <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 15:35:50 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
  It appears to me that Quinnipiac College is quite young as well, 8 Freshman,
and 9 Sophomores. Don't know how much ice time the young guys get, but from the
stats. it looks like quite a lot, and this should also help them in the future.
"Powerhouse", may have been a poor choice of words, but I do wonder just how good
Quinnipiac really is?
 
Larry Winer wrote:
 
> The 97-98 Army team is very inexperienced on defense (Army lost 4 key
> defensemen from last year's team) and this is not one of  Army 's better
> teams. There are about 7 plebes who log a ton of ice time and that should pay
> off in the future.
>
> HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
> [log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2