 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | |
| Date: | Mon, 9 Dec 1991 00:18:42 EST |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Date sent:
>Next week, I will officially start TCHCR. That merely means I will have
>some more stats and info to go along with the numbers. Also, I hope
>to send out answers to all the questions you have been sending me.
>
>Keith
>===================================
>
>The College Hockey Computer Rating
>compiled by Keith Instone
>
>Includes games on 12/8/91. Last week's ranking includes games on 12/1/91.
>
> Last Division I Schedule Schedule
>Rank Week Team Record Rating Strength Rank
> 1 6 Lake Superior 11 3 0 81.18 58.26 8
> 2 7 Maine 11 1 0 78.89 47.06 38
> 3 1 Michigan 8 3 2 78.87 64.25 1
> 4 4 Michigan State 7 2 2 75.43 60.17 4
> 5 2 Clarkson 9 1 0 75.13 44.83 42
> 6 5 Minnesota 10 4 0 74.94 56.72 12
> 7 3 Yale 6 0 1 74.28 45.08 41
> 8 9 Alaska-Anchorage 9 2 0 70.28 47.70 36
> 9 10 Western Michigan 7 4 1 64.90 54.73 17
> 10 8 New Hampshire 8 4 0 64.83 52.41 25
> 11 13 St Lawrence 7 2 0 64.53 42.61 43
> 12 11 Harvard 4 1 2 64.35 45.59 40
> 13 12 Northern Michigan 9 5 2 64.26 51.93 28
> 14 14 Boston University 7 4 0 59.74 51.95 27
> 15 18 UMass-Lowell 6 4 0 58.30 52.37 26
> 16 17 Wisconsin 9 6 1 58.10 53.07 22
> 17 15 Providence 9 4 0 57.50 42.52 44
> 18 21 Boston College 7 6 1 54.65 53.71 21
> 19 16 Minnesota-Duluth 6 7 1 54.12 57.87 9
> 20 19 Vermont 4 5 0 52.98 54.75 16
> 21 24 North Dakota 9 7 0 52.45 47.81 35
> 22 25 Michigan Tech 6 7 1 52.41 54.60 18
> 23 29 Illinois-Chicago 4 6 2 52.06 60.35 3
> 24 27 St Cloud 4 6 0 51.98 60.43 2
> 25 20 Miami 6 7 1 51.13 53.92 19
> 26 23 Cornell 2 4 2 50.48 59.07 7
> 27 22 Brown 3 4 1 46.27 51.60 29
> 28 26 RPI 5 6 0 45.34 49.45 32
> 29 32 Northeastern 3 7 0 43.36 60.08 6
> 30 30 Alaska-Fairbanks 5 7 0 43.34 48.02 34
> 31 31 Ferris State 2 6 2 43.33 57.05 11
> 32 28 Colorado College 4 8 2 43.19 53.84 20
> 33 34 Bowling Green 3 8 1 42.71 60.11 5
> 34 37 Merrimack 6 7 0 36.46 38.90 45
> 35 35 Ohio State 2 8 2 35.98 55.60 14
> 36 33 Princeton 2 6 0 35.87 52.55 23
> 37 39 Kent 2 8 1 33.33 50.25 31
> 38 40 Notre Dame 3 6 0 32.09 49.04 33
> 39 38 Denver 2 11 1 31.26 57.56 10
> 40 41 Alabama-Huntsville 1 6 0 30.93 54.78 15
> 41 42 Colgate 1 6 1 29.77 52.44 24
> 42 36 Dartmouth 1 4 0 27.97 51.46 30
> 43 43 Air Force 1 5 0 25.39 46.75 39
> 44 44 Union 0 6 0 20.65 56.62 13
> 45 45 Army 0 7 0 10.00 47.35 37
>
> Based on 246 Division I games.
ok I figured it out...
(this could hold true for any team i.e. Clarkson but we are concerned with
Maine at the moment)...schedule strength....
ok...Just because a team has been consistently ranked #1 ( or very near it)
is going to BY DEFAULT make their opponents and competitors schedules
stronger...no? i.e. they are #1 because it is less difficult for them to beat
a team as when a team ranked below them played the same team.
Also that 'same team' would also be ranked below the #1 of course, so that
'same team' is not going to be less difficult for the #1 to beat than
anyone else, BECAUSE the team is #1. Confused? :-)
so why should this by default be held against the current reigning #1 ?
for example: it is going to be much easier for the #1 team to beat the #10
(used arbitrarily) team than it is going to be for the # 25 (picked
arbitrarily) team. but because its the same team that the #1 and #25 are
trying to beat, it should be weighted the same!
J
***************
Johanna M. Wise
Email: [log in to unmask]
U.S. Mail: Collins-Box 153, Bloomington, IN 47406
Phone: (812) 857-1320
|
|
|
