HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Benjamin J. Flickinger" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 6 Mar 2004 16:41:55 EST
Reply-To:
"Benjamin J. Flickinger" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
--- You wrote: ---
Obviously I'm missing something.  Why does anything have to change?  I
suppose VTs travel partner could have an unfair advantage if teams
didn't/couldn't replace the "other" night with an out of conference
game. just wondering, wayne
--- End of quote ---

We had a controlled experiment a few years back, when UVM's season ended
prematurely due to the hazing scandel. Dartmouth basically got screwed, having
to play twice each weekend while their opponents only had one game to gear up
for. This was especially troublesome the 2nd night.

The single team left over (Who would likely be Princeton, as Dartmouth would
pair with Harvard and Yale with Brown) is disadvantaged, not advantaged.

Plus with 11 teams, you can never have a full slate of conference action,
especially down the stretch. Someone is always taking a night/weekend off.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2