Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 28 Mar 2000 14:43:05 -0400 |
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Here is the rationale for this situation. The minor penalty caused the team to
be shorthanded. The major made the team down two men. When the other team
receives a penalty, this essentially matches the penalty to player A-12. So we
have a minor to each team and a major to team A.
When B scores, player A-12 cannot come out of the box because his minor penalty
is matched by the minor penalty to B-16. And thus the only remaining penalty is
thw major to A-14 which cannot be washed out due to a goal. It is a little
strange, but this is the logic for NCAA.
Craig
Something came up in the BC-Michigan State game that left me wondering what
the exact ruling is. Here is the scenario:
Time Player
0:28 A-12 High Sticking minor
1:00 A-14 Slashing major
1:08 B-16 High Sticking minor
2:11 GOAL Team B
As you can see, the goal was scored when Team B had a 4-on-3 power play.
The question is - does the goal count against the minor penalty? My
understanding of CHA and pro rules tells me that it does, because the
second penalty is a major. Do NCAA rules differ on this?
John
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
|
|
|