> I thought ( was hoping ) Amherst would fare better last night. If you
> haven't heard, Princeton whalloped them 7-2. I was hoping to have seen
> a post here, since the box scores on USA Today don't even show
> penalties.
 
You can read all about the game at US College Hockey Online.
 
> Princeton used a different goalie is all three periods for no apparent
> reason. Amherst was definitely not putting a lot of shots on any of them.
> Maybe they took advantage of the non-conference road game to share
> the playing time.
 
That's exactly what they did.
 
> Princeton took a 0-1 deficit and turned it into a 4-1 lead in about 11
> minutes time early in the second period. Amherst made it 4-2 early in the
> third, but Princeton made it 5-2 at the 6:26 mark. Later, Princeton scored
> two goals during 5-on-3 advantages at the 16:37 mark and again at the
> 18:14 mark.
> What were the infractions?
 
UMass was getting pretty frustrated.  They took a slashing -- then, on the
delayed penalty, a UMass player battled axed J.P. O'Connor so there were two
penalties at once. Princeton scored three seconds into the penalty - then UMass
took another penalty right after, so it was back to 5-on-3.  During that, UMass
was called for Too Many Men on the Ice -- and so it was 5-on-3 for just about
the rest of the game.
 
> Attendance was over 3,000. Is this typical?
 
I don't know who was counting.  Obviously this was tickets sold.  There were
MAYBE 1,000 people there.
 
AW
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.