Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Kenneth M. Cleary |
Date: | Tue, 1 Mar 1994 02:36:25 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
PERSONALLY, THE IDEA OF HAVING SHOOTOUTS TO DECIDE ANY GAME IS A LUDICROUS
IDEA. BOTH TEAMS HAVE PLAYED 60-MINUTES OF REGULATION AND SOMETIMES JUST AS
MUCH OVERTIME. TO SAY THAT ONE TEAM IS A LOSER FOR THAT GAME IS CRAZY.
YES, I WILL SAY THAT PENALTY SHOTS ARE EXTREMELY EXCITING. FOR THAT ONE
MOMENT, THE ENTIRE ARENA IS CONCENTRATING ON THE SHOOTER AND THE GOALIE. I
DON'T THINK THAT SHOULD BE TAKEN OUT OF THE REGULAR COURSE OF A GAME. HOWEVER,
FOR ANYONE THAT HAS PLAYED ORGANIZED ATHLETICS AND BEEN INVOLVED IN A SHOOTOUT,
DOES THE LOSING TEAM REALLY DESERVE TO COME AWAY EMPTY-HANDED? YES, YOU GO
INTO A GAME EXPECTING A WINNER AND A LOSER, BUT I BELIEVE THERE ARE SOME TIMES
WHERE BOTH TEAMS WERE EVEN FOR A NIGHT AND DESERVE TO COME AWAY WITH SOMETHING,
(1-PT INSTEAD OF 0 OR 2).
JUST MY OPINION ON THE SUBJECT-NOT THAT IT'S GOING TO DECIDE ANYTHING.
KEN CLEARY
CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY
--WOULD SOMEBODY PLEASE GIVE US A HOCKEY PROGRAM!!!!!--
GO WOLVERINES--1994 NCAA HOCKEY CHAMPS!!!!!!
|
|
|