In a message dated 1/23/99 9:21:55 PM, [log in to unmask] writes:
 
<< >This is much too general of a statement. I've know too many 18 year old
phenom prospects who failed to continue to develop and have seen 20 year
old come from nowhere kids go from 5'11" 170 lbs to 6'1" 200 lbs 2 years
 
        I guess I'm not sure what point is being made here. It sounds like
agreement with what I was trying to say. Yes?
 >>
 
No. You were lumping all players together as if they were developing at the
exact same rate along with their age. Couldn't be more wrong.
 
>Excellent attempt at making no point whatsoever.
 
        <<Perhaps so,  but if you read Hendrickson's post and then mine you might
understand that he was giving a counterexample that I pointed out was
contradictory in itself.>>
 
OK...now you're just being silly...I get it.
 
Randy
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.