Content-transfer-encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 19:03:44 -0500 |
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
Mime-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
"Poetry, her border of ideas,
The edge, uncertain, but a means of blending
With other strata
Where the lower and higher have ending;"
Is this "superpsition" intended to be "super position", "superb position",
or "superstition"? Could you define for us whichever term you intended?
Charles
----------
>From: Jacob Korg <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Difficulty in Dante and Pound
>Date: Tue, Jan 7, 2003, 6:15 PM
>
> Dear Tim:
> I was going tosecond Dirk's suggestion about Sordello before he
> beat me to it. But you have been noble enough in trying to get both
> graduates and undergranduates through the great traditional epics.
> I didn't at first see how the Browning poems would fit in -- but
> there may be a valid connection through the Italian setting many of
> them have, plus the meditations on the nature of art.
> A small and perhaps trite tip to all and sundry plus Stoner; entry
> to many of Pound;'s obscruties is through his own superpsition -- the
> contiguity of apparently unrelated particulars.
> Jacob Korg
|
|
|