Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 3 Jun 2023 16:32:51 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I don't often weigh in here; but while we're on this topic, I feel
compelled to share the following. Years ago I borrowed a library book that
had a political bent not shared by the majority of the residents. (My
husband has a degree in political science and enjoys reading differing
viewpoints on that subject.) As the librarian glanced at the cover I could
see distaste on her face. After checking it out, she placed it face down on
my stack in which she placed all others face up. Her message was clear; she
disapproved of the book and wanted me to know it. Hopefully we aren't all
as transparent as that. Neutrality is a challenge that requires fairly
vigilant self-examination, and we need to be mindful of the messages we
send in gestures both large and small.
Deborah Clark shared this article a while back--
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2022/03/03/libraries-and-the-contested-terrain-of-neutrality/
On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 3:24 PM Brendon B <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> If neutrality (yours, mine, ours, etc.) benefits one group of people more
> than another, it's not neutrality.
>
--
*Nina Woodward*
*Library Director*
*Chase Emerson Memorial Library*
*17 Main St., P.O. Box 9*
*Deer Isle, ME 04627*
*deerislelibrary.org <http://deerislelibrary.org>*
*(207) 348-2899*
*subscribe to our email newsletter: http://eepurl.com/ghhPK5
<http://eepurl.com/ghhPK5>*
*_______________*
*Monday 2-6*
*Tuesday 1-5*
*Wednesday 10-4*
*Saturday 9-12*
|
|
|