>
> Cheers,
> Mr. Pound
>

Mr. James, Stoner, Steiner, Bernstein, Yin or
[log in to unmask]@64.30.167.16:

Would you please stop playing your name around ? It is becoming TOO funny.
If you really want to talk seriously your idea in the list, please keep a
consistent name, otherwise, you looks like a Xiao Chou at the first place.

Thanks.

Hongguang Bi

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stoner James" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: A Pact


> I do know the answer to the question about Pound and W.W--one of the few
> that used to belong to this site who could actually answer the question;
> nobody on your comp committee will ask the question because it wouldn't
> occur to them. Although, I know the answer on "A Pact" I don't want to
> bore you with the polemic, however, ever how.  By the way, way, way, I
> could also manage the Harold Bloom persona, but I don't like the guy very
> much. He's the great asshole of American criticism, an mere imitator. Oh,
> by the way, most people find Emerson difficult; he does take time and
> effort--afterall he is a great poet philosopher.  He's difficult like
> Pound is difficult.  Also, if you actually believe there is a "truth," I
> wonder how you support such an assertion without providing a polemic of
> your own.  Truth is irrelevant in the real world and you will NEVER have
> access to it, except as found through the seer, the poet--this both Pound
> and Emerson though true.  We could say that your mere assertion, you
> provide a polemic of sort.  You folks miss something significant when you
> fail to see the connect/disconnect between Pound and Emerson and his
> enterage (which include HDT and WW.)  Whiteman by the way was just the
> physical manifestation of Emerson.  By the way, Whiteman was not a
> Victorian poet, as you suggest.  We could say that Emerson was, although
> he wanted to move beyond the neoclassical simple-minded poetic.  Pound
> went far beyond all these guys.  Because a few (or more) of you folks fail
> to understand the over-arching poetic and politic of the Cantos, doesn't
> mean there isn't one, won, 1.
>
> I wish you well, everyone.  Thanks for the good time, but I think I will
> seek out individuals and not groups for help.  I fair better that way.
> I'm a seer like Pound and Emerson was; nothing more than a miserable
> receptical in which either the gods or the oversoul or some other
> metaphysical manifestation pours its miserable poesy.  The poesy isn't
> mine though, but the metaphysical phenomenons.  I think I'll check into
> the mental hospital, now--maybe I can finish the Cantos.
>
> Cheers,
> Mr. Pound
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com