Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 19 Feb 1999 03:21:58 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In my opinion, the particular tripartitie structure mentioned
below was a temporary one of Pound's, and a superficial one
at that. The depth structure, working at various levels, is
the Dantesque one--hell, purg, paradise--and is applicable
for the entire poem, not just 1-16.
==Dan Pearlman
>
>> Does anyone know of any critics who have attempted a breakdown of the
>> first 16 Cantos (or even the entire work) in terms of this tri-partite
>> (ephemeral/recurrent/eternal) structure? I have been working on it
>> myself, but it seems likely that someone would have attempted this
>> already.
>>
Dan Pearlman Office: Department of English
102 Blackstone Blvd. #5 University of Rhode Island
Providence, RI 02906 Kingston, RI 02881
Tel.: 401 453-3027 Tel.: 401 874-4659
email: [log in to unmask] Fax: 401 874-2580
|
|
|