Maybe. But I don't see the word processor as the problem. Its the
cotton-candy-for-the-eyes-and-mind quality of the incoming information that
is the culprit, I think; TV, radio, magazines, Hollywood movies, etc.
 
> ----------
> From:         Peter Bi
> Reply To:     Ezra Pound discussion list of the University of Maine
> Sent:         Monday, January 17, 2000 4:27 PM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: Thanks and query
>
> Agree. 2 other cents: this is not only in writings but also in our social
> and political opinions.
>
> Modern communications tools such as TV, radio and now, Internet, force us
> to think fast and to conclude what is wrong or right quickly. Instead of
> taking longer time to analyze information, we tend to eat them without a
> second thought. We think we are superior than those who don't have access
> to the information. But actually, we are influenced easier by the media.
>
> Peter Bi
>
> Robert Kibler wrote:
>
>