"Then Dan Pearlman's inadequacy is my inadequacy."
But then how would you react to
1) Specific quotes I mentioned which indicate that POUND HIMSELF equated
Confucianism with modern fascism, and
2) Historical evidence which shows that Confucianism was used as a doctrine
to butress a highly authoritarian central government in China, a system
which strove to oppress the vast majority, and to stifle individual
religious expression
???
[Incidentally, I am talking about a particular thesis being inadequate in
the light of evidence. I am not talking about anyone's personal inadequacy.
That would be counterproductive, I think. ]
Regards,
Wei
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com