I don't think that anyone really ever judges, or can judge, ideas
one at a time.  Ideas are interlinked into systems which support
them--or fail to, as the case may be.  Pound says (somewhere in the
late Cantos), "Look to the source," or words to that effect--meaning
check out WHO is telling you something, not just the something you're
getting told: and that means, in support of what I've said above,
the individual idea exists in a more or less vulnerable moral/
political/logical context and is not separable from it.
 
I am reminded of a book on the Cantos written by a guy named
Nasser (Nassar?) who thought he could do a salvaging operation
by rescuing the few lyrical passages from the 95% dreck he
regarded the rest of the poem to be.  Well, that's an example
of looking at the parts in disregard of the whole, but the
problem was that those lyrical parts were, and are, largely
incomprehensible out of context.
 
==Dan
 
At 08:28 AM 8/27/99 -0400, you wrote:
>Pound said, "Every man has the right to have his ideas examined one at a
time."   (or something pretty close to that).
>Tim Romano
>
>Robert Kibler wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> What did Pound say--he wished that his work would be examined in its
parts, and not taken and > judged at once, as a whole.
>> [...]
>
HOME:
Dan Pearlman
102 Blackstone Blvd. #5
Providence, RI 02906
Tel.: 401 453-3027
email: [log in to unmask]
Fax: (253) 681-8518
http://www.uri.edu/artsci/english/clf/
 
OFFICE
Department of English
University of Rhode Island
Kingston, RI 02881
Tel.: 401 874-4659