Dave,
Your subject, as you've generally defined it to date,
sounds too difficult to do anything original with--even
given a lot more than the ten months you've got. It
took me a few years to figure out the lay of the
land.
Might I suggest that you make life easier for yourself
and do a study which focuses on the various critical
views (major ones) that have come forth on overall
Cantos structure, perhaps categorizing these views,
maybe even chancing a bit of evaluation of them--
as to whether they make the reading any more accessible?
You might then locate your own work to date somewhere
along this critical axis.
My revulsion at "transpiration" is that I still don't
think "transpire" is a *formally* acceptable synonym for
"to happen."
Anyway, good luck with the project. Worst that can
happen is you'll learn a lot.
==Dan
At 05:47 PM 6/3/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Dan:
>
>You wrote: "In other words,
>the thesis statement you give below sounds too general, or
>like rediscovery of the wheel. Perhaps you can refine it"
>
>. . . . tell me about it, I've got at least six books on the table on the
>topic of organization of _Cantos_; the theme seems quite done already. At
>present it doesn't seem like there is a "new" angle at all. But on the plus
>side, I've got about 10 months to complete the thing (and its an undergrad
>project -- meaning they're taking it easy).
>
>What interests me about organization is the controversy; T. S. Eliot said:
>"That never worries me, and I do not believe that I care. I know that Pound
>has a scheme and a kind of philosophy behind it; it is quite enough for me
>that he thinks he knows what he is doing." Plenty of other critics become
>fully irate at the notion of finding order to _Cantos_.
>
>Even in responding to my little blip there seems to be a variety of degrees
>of opinion as to how much intentional structure there was / is in it. I
>don't think that I plan to find a structure which has never been seen, but I
>would like to accurately explore what IS there. Over the months, I may
>develop a "new" angle, but now I've got to produce a draft of a prospectus.
>
>Several critics have objectified "Odysseus in Hades" (I - XXX) as a thematic
>and structural introduction for all of the following Cantos wherein (I'm
>gleening from different sources) the concept of the "subject rhyme" is
>introduced.
>
>how's ". . . mimicking the seeming spontaneity" of real-world events sound,
>instead of transpiration?
>
>what's wrong with "transpiration"?
>
>
>Anyway, thanks to all respondents. I'll be back.
>
>
>Dave Centrone
>
>
>At 06:54 PM 6/3/98 +0900, you wrote:
>>
>>Received: from lists.village.Virginia.EDU (lists.village.Virginia.EDU
>[128.143.200.198]) by clsun.cl.aoyama.ac.jp (8.8.2+2.6Wbeta9/3.5Wclsun0701)
>with ESMTP id OAA04837 for <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 14:37:39
>+0900 (JST)
>>Received: (from domo@localhost) by lists.village.Virginia.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.6)
>id AAA28563 for foucault-outgoing; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 00:17:21 -0400
>>Received: from mail1.doit.wisc.edu (mail1.doit.wisc.edu [144.92.9.40]) by
>lists.village.Virginia.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP id AAA41614 for
><[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 00:17:16 -0400
>>Received: from [144.92.183.38] by mail1.doit.wisc.edu
>> id XAA42158 (8.8.6/50); Tue, 2 Jun 1998 23:17:14 -0500
>>X-Authentication-Warning: lists.village.Virginia.EDU: domo set sender to
>owner-foucault@localhost using -f
>>From: [log in to unmask]
>>Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
>>X-Sender: [log in to unmask]
>>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.2 (32)
>>Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 23:12:58 -0500
>>To: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
>>Mime-Version: 1.0
>>Sender: [log in to unmask]
>>Precedence: bulk
>>Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>>>Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 23:06:15 -0500
>>>To: [log in to unmask](robert brown)
>>>From: [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>>If you receive an email titled "WIN A HOLIDAY" DO NOT open it.
>>>> It will erase everything on your hard drive. Forward this letter
>>>> out to as many people as you can. This is a new, very malicious
>>>> virus and not many people know about it. This information was
>>>> announced yesterday morning from Microsoft; please share it with
>>>> everyone that might access the internet.
>>>>
>>>> Once again, pass this along to everyone in your address book so
>>>> that this may be stopped.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Dan Pearlman Office: Department of English
102 Blackstone Blvd. #5 University of Rhode Island
Providence, RI 02906 Kingston, RI 02881
Tel.: 401 453-3027 Tel.: 401 874-4659
email: [log in to unmask] Fax: 401 874-2580
|